<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PAR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Anticancer Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3545</issn><eissn>2208-3553</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/par.v10i2.14542</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Redefining Prognostic Risk in Colorectal Cancer: Calibrated Deep Learning Reclassifies High-Risk Mortality and Mitigates Overtreatment</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PAR/10/2/10.26689/par.v10i2.14542</url><author>YiFengmei</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-04-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>Accurate prognostic risk stratification is critical for colorectal cancer (CRC), yet traditional linear models are limited by complex non-linear multi-omics interactions. We compared three mainstream survival models (regularized Cox, random survival forests [RSF], and DeepSurv) via multi-scenario simulations spanning linear to strongly non-linear risks, with rigorous validation in TCGA (n = 610) and independent GEO (n = 566) cohorts using a five-dimensional evaluation framework, plus blinded isotonic regression for model calibration. DeepSurv showed significant predictive superiority in non-linear scenarios, achieving a global C-index of 0.7820 in TCGA (vs 0.7610 for regularized Cox), 42.18% net reclassification improvement for high-risk mortality patients, and 20.60% reduced prediction error after calibration, with robust external validation performance. The regularized Cox model remained robust for linear low-dimensional data. In conclusion, calibrated DeepSurv is optimal for high-risk CRC identification in complex multi-omics data, providing a standardized paradigm for survival model selection.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al., 2021, Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3): 209–249.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012, Comprehensive Molecular Characterization of Human Colon and Rectal Cancer. Nature, 487(7407): 330–337.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cox DR, 1972, Regression Models and Life-Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2): 187–202.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma S, Huang J, 2007, Regularized Cox Regression in High-Dimensional and Low-Sample Size Settings. Biometrics, 63(3): 813–820.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ishwaran H, Kogalur UB, Blackstone EH, et al., 2008, Random Survival Forests. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2(3): 841–860.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Katzman JL, Shaham U, Cloninger A, et al., 2018, DeepSurv: A Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using a Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Network. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1): 24.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang L, Chen G, Li J, et al., 2023, Multi-Omics Integration for Colorectal Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Computational Biology and Chemistry, 108(1): 107802.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>National Cancer Institute, 2025, U.S. Genome Data Sharing Data Portal, visited on June 10, 2025, https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, et al., 2001, Missing Value Estimation Methods for DNA Microarrays. Bioinformatics, 17(6): 520–525.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cai L, Zhong Z, Yang M, et al., 2022, Simulation of Survival Data with Specified Censoring Proportions and Its R Implementation. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 39(2): 287–290.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, et al., 2011, On the C-Statistics for Evaluating Overall Adequacy of Risk Prediction Procedures with Censored Survival Data. Statistics in Medicine, 30(10): 1105–1117.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gerds TA, Kattan MW, Schumacher M, et al., 2021, Assessing the Performance of Prediction Models for Survival Data: A General Framework for Measuring Discrimination, Calibration, and Clinical Utility. Biometrical Journal, 63(1): 124–143.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB Sr, D’Agostino RB Jr, et al., 2008, Evaluating the Added Predictive Ability of a New Marker: From Area Under the ROC Curve to Reclassification and Beyond. Statistics in Medicine, 27(2): 157–172.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Benson AB 3rd, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al., 2022, NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colon Cancer, Version 2.2022. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 20(3): 359–369.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ching T, Zhu X, Garmire LX, 2018, Deep Learning-Based Survival Analysis Using Multi-Omics Data from TCGA. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 23: 24–35.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang JL, Zhong Q, 2025, Joint Modeling of Longitudinal and Survival Data. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 12: 449–476.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen Z, Shen Y, Qin J, et al., 2024, Likelihood Adaptively Incorporated External Aggregate Information with Uncertainty for Survival Data. Biometrics, 80(4): ujae120.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
