<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PAR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Anticancer Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3545</issn><eissn>2208-3553</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/par.v10i4.15848</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Inferring Tumor Spatial Gene Expression from Routine H&amp;E Images: Pan-Cancer Validation and Spatial Profiling of Primary Breast Tumors and Lymph Node Metastases</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PAR/10/4/10.26689/par.v10i4.15848</url><author>LiangYuping,XuSiwen</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-11</published-time></date></history><abstract>Spatial transcriptomics (ST) enables gene expression profiling while preserving tissue architecture, but its high cost and limited throughput constrain large-scale applications. This study evaluated the biological utility of VirtualST, a conditional diffusion model for inferring spatial gene expression from H&amp;amp;E images, in colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), primary invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (IDC), and breast cancer lymph node metastasis (LYMPH_IDC). Twelve samples with paired H&amp;amp;E images and ground-truth ST data were evaluated using leave-one-sample-out cross-validation. Inference started from pure noise, with ground-truth expression used only for post hoc evaluation, and the final prediction for each sample was obtained by averaging ten sampling runs. The mean gene-wise Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) were 0.467, 0.439, and 0.496 for COAD, IDC, and LYMPH_IDC, respectively, with better reconstruction of tumor epithelial, secretory, and proliferative programs. Using ground-truth ST epithelial scores from the held-out samples as an independent molecular reference, the predicted and ground-truth scores achieved within-sample Pearson correlations of 0.79 and 0.66 in IDC and LYMPH_IDC, respectively, with corresponding hotspot Dice coefficients of 0.64 and 0.44. These results indicate that VirtualST can recover within-sample spatial epithelial signals but is not suitable for absolute quantification across tissues or direct pathological region detection.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ståhl PL, Salmén F, Vickovic S, et al., 2016, Visualization and Analysis of Gene Expression in Tissue Sections by Spatial Transcriptomics. Science, 353(6294): 78–82.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>He B, Bergenstråhle L, Stenbeck L, et al., 2020, Integrating Spatial Gene Expression and Breast Tumour Morphology via Deep Learning. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 4(8): 827–834.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pang M, Su K, Li M, 2021, Leveraging Information in Spatial Transcriptomics to Predict Super-Resolution Gene Expression from Histology Images in Tumors. bioRxiv.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zeng Y, Wei Z, Yu W, et al., 2022, Spatial Transcriptomics Prediction from Histology Jointly Through Transformer and Graph Neural Networks. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 23(5): bbac297.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jaume G, Doucet P, Song AH, et al., 2024, HEST-1k: A Dataset for Spatial Transcriptomics and Histology Image Analysis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Filiot A, Jacob P, Mac KA, Saillard C, 2024, Phikon-v2, A Large and Public Feature Extractor for Biomarker Prediction. arXiv.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Graham S, Vu QD, Raza SEA, et al., 2019, HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Images. Medical Image Analysis, 58: 101563.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ho J, Jain A, Abbeel P, 2020, Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33: 6840–6851.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
