<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PAR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Anticancer Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3545</issn><eissn>2208-3553</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/par.v2i5.719</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Evaluation of diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for malignant and benign breast lesions</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PAR/2/5/10.26689/par.v2i5.719</url><author>ZengYanni,ZhangHongwei,ZhangJiuxia,YuYan,LiuLiangjin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2018-10-01</published-time></date></history><abstract>[Abstract] Objectives: To investigate diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for malignant and benign breast lesions. Methods: Retrospective analysis of treatment data of 48 patients diagnosed with malignant and benign breast lesions in our hospital, collected from December 2017 to November 2018. A total number of 56 breast masses were examined by both ultrasound and MRI, and were compared with postoperative pathological biopsy results. Results: Postoperative pathological biopsy results showed that there were 26 and 30 malignant and benign lesions respectively. Comparison of MRI curve type of malignant and benign lesions showed statistical significance (P&amp;lt;0.05). By comparison with pathological biopsy results, specificity and sensitivity of ultrasound diagnosis were 83.33% (25/30) and 84.61% (22/26) respectively; specificity and sensitivity of MRI diagnosis were 96.66% (29/30) and 92.30% (24/26) respectively. Conclusions: Ultrasonographic examination of malignant and benign breast lesions is straight-forward, simple and inexpensive. Accuracy, specificity and sensitivity of MRI are significantly higher than ultrasound in examining malignant and benign breast lesions, this can reduce misdiagnosis.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ping Li, Yun Zhou, Yan Huang. Comparison of diagnostic value of X-ray ultrasound and MRI for benign and malignant breast lesions [J]. Hebei Medicine,2016(11).</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ping Lu. Diagnostic value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for benign and malignant breast lesions [J]. Journal of Hubei University for Nationalities(Medical Edition), 2017(4).</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>He Xiaoqing, Liang Hanhuan, Feng Qingyi, et al. Clinical application of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis with benign and malignant breast lesions[J]. Journal of Guangdong Medical College, 2016(5).</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wei Wei. Comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in diagnosis of breast malignant lesions [J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine (Electronic Edition), 2016, 9(2): 122â€“124.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang Zhang. Diagnostic efficacy of three most commonly used imaging methods of ultrasound, mammography and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for breast lesions [J]. Guide of Chinese Medicine, 2017(30): 94.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Baotao Zhang. Diagnostic value of color ultrasound, X-ray mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer [J]. China Continuing Medical Education, 2018.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chunping Wei, Shuying Bai. Comparison of diagnostic value of high frequency ultrasound, magnetic resonance and their combination for breast cancer [J]. Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases, 2016, 31(5): 582.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hao Yang, Wenwei Chen, Jiabao Yin. Clinical value of ultrasound elastography combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast cancer [J]. China Medical Herald, 2016, 13(25).</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
