<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PAR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Anticancer Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2208-3545</issn><eissn>2208-3553</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/par.v5i1.1878</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Clinical Application Value and Satisfaction Analysis of Physical Therapy in rehabilitation treatment of cervical spondylosis</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PAR/5/1/10.26689/par.v5i1.1878</url><author>LiJianhong</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2021-03-10</published-time></date></history><abstract>Objective: To analyze the clinical value and nursing satisfaction of physical therapy in the rehabilitation of patients with cervical spondylosis. Methods: From November 2019 to November 2020, 84 patients with cervical spondylosis were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was given physical therapy, while group B was not given physical therapy. The differences of curative effect, cervical function, quality of life score and nursing satisfaction between the two groups were analyzed. Results:&amp;nbsp;The curative effect of group A was 97.62% higher than that of group B 83.33%, P &amp;lt; 0.05; The score of cervical function in group A (8.09 ± 1.75) was higher than that in group B (8.09 ± 1.75), P &amp;lt; 0.05; The scores of quality of life in group A were better than those in group B (P &amp;lt; 0.05); The nursing satisfaction of group A was 95.24%, which was better than that of group B 78.57%, P &amp;lt; 0.05. Conclusions: Physical therapy intervention for patients with cervical spondylosis can improve nursing satisfaction and cervical function, which can be widely used.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list/></back></article>
