PARProceedings of Anticancer Research2208-35452208-3553Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/par.v6i4.3917ArticleA Comprehensive Analysis of a Case of Internal Carotid Artery Stentinghttps://artdesignp.com/journal/PAR/6/4/10.26689/par.v6i4.3917SunMeng,WangJun,WangYamei2022642022-07-28With the development of science and technology and the continuous progress of interventional equipment, internal carotid artery stenting has become increasingly popular among patients in view of its advantages, which include high efficiency, minimally invasive, and fast postoperative recovery. It has grown importance as a surgical method for the treatment of severe internal carotid artery stenosis. This paper discusses a rare case of severe internal carotid artery stenosis and its management, where various types of pre-dilatation balloons were not able to be positioned in the stenting process. Relevant solutions have also been proposed in hope to provide a more theoretical and practical basis for clinical work.  

Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al., 1998, Benefit of Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Moderate or Severe Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(20): 1415–1425.

Mayberg MR, Wilson SE, Yatsu F, et al., 1991, Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. JAMA, 266(23): 3289–3294.

Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al., 2010, Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(1): 11–23.

Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS, et al., 2016, Long-Term Results of Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Carotid-Artery Stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(11): 1021–1031.