<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v3i5.1584</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>The Comparative Discussion of State Owned Enterprise in Competition Law </title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/3/5/10.26689/pbes.v3i5.1584</url><author>ChenQiongwen</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2020-11-16</published-time></date></history><abstract>Reflect on the benefits and costs of the current approaches in the European Union and the People's Republic of China. To the conclusion that State Owned Enterprises (SOE)'s and more generally state conduct should be fully covered by competition law.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list/></back></article>
