<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v5i3.3980</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Conflicts in Defining Data Ownership in China’s Digital Transformation and the Regulatory Path</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/5/3/10.26689/pbes.v5i3.3980</url><author>SiZihan,MaiNuowen,QuanYifei,ZhouYihuan,ZhangXiaoyue</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2022-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>China is aggressively pursuing digital transformation, and data, alike labor, technology, capital, and knowledge, has become as a crucial factor of production. Digital transformation is accelerating the emergence of a data-intensive society, and the ensuing difficulties of balancing freedom and responsibility, openness and security, as well as free sharing and legal regulation are posing new challenges to national and social governance. Among these challenges, defining data ownership, the social disorder and anomie brought about by the unclear definition of data ownership, and data ownership regulatory path are new propositions that need to be urgently addressed in this data-intensive society. This paper systematically explains the theoretical meaning and practical value of data ownership through a literature review on the analysis of domestic and foreign scholars as well as research think tanks, compares the differences and inherent conflicts between the definition of data ownership by the government, enterprises, and society in China, thoroughly compares the definition standards of the European Union, the United States, and Japan, and on this basis, discusses the formation of a definition of data ownership that meets the requirements of China’s digital transformation.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pang B, 2020, Opinions of the State Council of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Building a More Perfect Institutional Mechanism for Market-Based Allocation of Factors. www.gov.cn. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-04/09/content_5500622.htm</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou Y, Li Y, Cui K, et al., 2013, Database Principles and Development Applications (2nd Edition), Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 1–2.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Scassa T, 2018, Data Ownership. CIGI Papers No. 187, Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No. 2018-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3251542</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rees C, 2014, Who Owns Our Data?. Computer Law &amp; Security Review, 30(1): 75–79.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bastani A, 2019, Fully Automated Luxury Communism, Verso Books, London, UK, 29–31.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu H, 2021, Data Hegemony and the New Type of Digital Imperialist Plunder. Contemporary Economic Studies, 306(2): 25–32.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen L, 2020, A Study on the Concept of Personal Data Ownership System and the Basic Establishment Framework. China Business Journal, 2020(20): 176–178.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lee J, 2019, A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Ownership of Personal Data. Journal of Chongqing College of Arts and Sciences (Social Science Edition), 38(6): 114–122.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ambrose ML, Ausloos J, 2013, The Right to be Forgotten Across the Pond. Journal of Information Policy, 3(1): 1–23.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ying Y, 2019, Interim Measures for the Opening of Public Data in Shanghai (Shanghai Government Order No. 21). Shanghai Municipal People’s Government. https://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw48156/20200825/0001-48156_62825.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chongqing Municipal People’s Government General Office, 2020, Interim Measures for the Open Management of Public Data in Chongqing (Chongqing Government Order No. 111). Chongqing Municipal People’s Government. http://www.cq.gov.cn/zwgk/zfxxgkml/szfwj/xzgfxwj/szfbgt/202009/t20200918_8837781.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang Y, 2020, Legal Protection and Restriction of Data Property Rights from the Positioning of Factors of Production, South China University of Technology.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>2016, Data Circulation Industry Self-Regulation Convention Version 2.0 was Officially Released in Beijing. Sohu. https://www.sohu.com/a/103057203_162886</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>iiMedia Report, 2020, 2020 China Mobile App Privacy Permissions Measurement Report. iiMedia Research. https://www.iimedia.cn/c1061/69301.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>2018, European Commission General Data Protection. Intersoft Consulting. https://gdpr-info.eu/</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Galvin HK, DeMuro PR, 2020, Developments in Privacy and Data Ownership in Mobile Health Technologies, 2016-2019. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 29(1): 32–43.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao H, 2021, A Study of the Differences in Data Governance Paths Between the US and Europe in the TikTok Controversy. Journal of Intelligence, 40(5): 104–110 + 131.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>U.S. Department of Commerce, EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework Principles Issued by The U.S. Department of Commerce. Privacy Shield Framework. https://www.privacyshield.gov/servlet/servlet.FileDownload?file=015t00000004qAg</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang R, 2015, An Exploration of Data Ownership: The Core Legal Issue of Big Data Transactions. Big Data, 1(2): 41–47.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Van Alstyne M, Brynjolfsson E, Madnick S, 1995, Why Not One Big Database? Principles for Data Ownership. Decision Support Systems, 15(4): 267–284.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu C, Yu J, 2020, Exploration of Data Ownership Protection, Pricing and Distributed Application Mechanism for Public Management. E-Government, 2020(1): 29–38.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
