<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v7i1.6080</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Study on the Measurement of the Development Level of Common Prosperity</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/7/1/10.26689/pbes.v7i1.6080</url><author>CaiKun</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-02-25</published-time></date></history><abstract>Constructing a comprehensive prosperity evaluation index system from the dimensions of “affluence” and “commonality,” consisting of 23 detailed indicators, this study utilizes the entropy method and provincial panel data from 2011 to 2020 to measure the level of common prosperity across Chinese provinces. The research findings indicate an overall upward trend in the common prosperity development level among provinces during the sample period. Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Jiangsu exhibit the highest common prosperity indices at the provincial level. From a spatial perspective, significant disparities exist in the common prosperity levels among different regions. Consequently, policy recommendations are proposed: Tailoring strategies for regional development based on realities, reinforcing regional coordinated development, and promoting the advancement of common prosperity.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou W, Shi X, 2022, Connotation Features and Practical Approaches of Common Prosperity. China Review of Political Economy, 13(3): 3–23.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li S, 2021, China’s Goal and Paths of Common Prosperity. Economic Research Journal, 56(11): 4–13.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu W, Chen Y, 2021, Economic Development between the Two Centenary Goals: Tasks, Challenges and Strategies. Social Sciences in China, 2021(3): 86–102 + 206.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Yu W, 2022, Discussion on Statistical Monitoring and Evaluation of Common Prosperity. Statistical Research, 39(2): 3–17.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen LJ, Yu JX, Xu YN, 2021, Construction of the Common Prosperity Index Model. Governance Studies, 37(4): 5–16 + 2.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wan HY, Chen JP, 2021, Common Prosperity’s Theoretical Connotation and Quantitative Method. Finance &amp; Trade Economics, 42(12): 18–33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu PL, Qian T, Huang XH, et al., 2021, The Connotation, Realization Path and Measurement Method of Common Prosperity for All. Journal of Management World, 37(8): 117–129.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fang DC, Ma WB, 2019, Study on the Measurement of China’s Inter-Provincial High-Quality Development and Its Spatial-Temporal Characteristics. Regional Economic Review, 2019(2): 61–70.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tobler WR, 1970, A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region. Economic Geography, 46(2): 234–240.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
