<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v8i4.11924</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Institutional Logics and Its Application in Entrepreneurship Research</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/8/4/10.26689/pbes.v8i4.11924</url><author>QinMengxuan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-09-10</published-time></date></history><abstract>Institutional logic theory, a pivotal framework within organizational studies, delineates the multifaceted and intricate logics that underpin organizational fields. This theoretical perspective elucidates the manner in which diverse individuals or groups within an organization internalize and manifest distinct institutional logics, alongside the ensuing political and cultural conflicts. Furthermore, the theory endeavors to elucidate the complexities inherent in institutional logic across organizational fields, examining the reflection of these logics among various individuals or groups and their associated political and cultural dichotomies. Central to this discourse is the acknowledgment of the core systems that constitute the fabric of a country, encompassing the state, market, familial structures, corporate entities, professional bodies, and religious institutions. These components not only coexist with inherent conflicts but also exhibit a high degree of interdependence, underlined by their shared institutional logics. This literature attempts to review and analysis institutional logic in the field of entrepreneurship and integrates institutional logic into entrepreneurs’ personal background, experience, and other social characteristics, and study how institutional logic operates. It is recommended that future researchers take entrepreneurs as the research object and conduct more in-depth research on the evolution of organizational response strategies when political and cultural conflicts occur between different groups within the enterprise, combined with institutional logic theory.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Meyer JW, Rowan B, 1977, Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340–363. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>North DC, 1990, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, viewed on November 8, 2025.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lounsbury M, Glynn MA, 2001, Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 545–564. doi:10.1002/smj.188.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>McPherson CM, Sauder M, 2013, Logics in Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2): 165–196. doi:10.1177/0001839213486447.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pache AC, Santos F, 2010, When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3): 455–476. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.51142368.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dunn MB, Jones C, 2010, Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1): 114–149. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, et al., 2011, Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1): 317–371. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Paolella L, Durand R, 2016, Category Spanning, Evaluation, and Performance: Revised Theory and Test on the Corporate Law Market. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1): 330–351. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0651.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lee MY, Lim W, 2017, Investigating Preservice Teachers’ Written Feedback on Procedure-Based Mathematics Assessment Items. In: Kaur B, Ho WK, Toh TL, Choy BH (eds) Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Singapore.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Haveman HA, Gualtieri G, 2017, Institutional Logics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, viewed on November 8, 2023.doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.137.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lee MDP, Lounsbury M, 2015, Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste. Organization Science, 26(3): 847–866. doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0959.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Selznick P, 1948, Foundations of the Theory of Organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1): 25–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2086752.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel P, et al., 2001, Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 2: e13.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hoffman AJ, 1999, Institutional Evolution and Change: Environmentalism and the U.S. Chemical Industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4): 351–371. doi:10.5465/257008.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nigam A, Ocasio W, 2010, Event Attention, Environmental Sensemaking, and Change in Institutional Logics: An Inductive Analysis of the Effects of Public Attention to Clinton’s Health Care Reform Initiative. Organization Science, 21(4): 823–841. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0490.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Haveman HA, Rao H, 1997, Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry. American Journal of Sociology, 102(6): 1606–1651. doi:10.1086/231128.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Thornton P, Ocasio W, 2008, Institutional Logics. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2008: 99–129. doi:10.4135/9781849200387.n4.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lounsbury M, 2011, A Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2): 289–307. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.24634436.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pfeffer J, Salancik GR, 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wry T, Lounsbury M, Glynn M, 2011, Legitimating Nascent Collective Identities: Coordinating Cultural Entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22(2): 449–463. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0613.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM, 2015, Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4): 596–633. doi:10.1177/0001839215592913.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tracey P, Dalpiaz E, Phillips N, 2018, Fish Out of Water: Translation, Legitimation, and New Venture Creation. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5): 1627–1666. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0264.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Reay T, Hinings CR, 2005, The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3): 351–384. doi:10.1177/0170840605050872.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ault JK, 2016, An Institutional Perspective on the Social Outcome of Entrepreneurship: Commercial Microfinance and Inclusive Markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8): 951–967. doi:10.1057/jibs.2016.18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Martens ML, Jennings JE, Jennings PD, 2007, Do the Stories They Tell Get Them the Money They Need? The Role of Entrepreneurial Narratives in Resource Acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 1107–1132. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.27169488.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Berthod O, 2018, Institutional Theory of Organizations. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 2018: 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9_63.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Szostak B, Durand R, Jourdan J, et al., 2013, Institutional Logics as Strategic Resources. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 39: 165–201.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28" content-type="article"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jain S, Sharma D, 2013, Institutional Logic Migration and Industry Evolution in Emerging Economies: The Case of Telephony in India. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(3): 252–271. doi:10.1002/sej.1160.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29" content-type="article"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Battilana J, Dorado S, 2010, Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6): 1419–1440. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.57318391.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30" content-type="article"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Almandoz J, 2012, Arriving at the Starting Line: The Impact of Community and Financial Logics on New Banking Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6): 1381–1406. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0361.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31" content-type="article"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao EY, Lounsbury M, 2016, An Institutional Logics Approach to Social Entrepreneurship: Market Logic, Religious Diversity, and Resource Acquisition by Microfinance Organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6): 643–662. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.09.001.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
