<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v8i6.12603</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>The Partial Centralization Decision for ClosedLoop Supply Chain Coordination with Trade-In Strategy</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/8/6/10.26689/pbes.v8i6.12603</url><author>LuoMao</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-11-06</published-time></date></history><abstract>To explore the impact of partial centralization on supply chain performance, this study constructs a two-period game model of a closed-loop supply chain involving a manufacturer and an online retail platform participating in the trade-in strategy. Through mathematical modeling and numerical simulation methods, the optimal decisions were analyzed under conditions where the manufacturer partially owns the retail platform’s partial equity. This study finds that partial centralization yields the highest profits, followed by full centralization, with decentralized decisions yielding the lowest profits. Moderate centralization enhances overall profits by optimizing incentive mechanisms, whereas excessive ownership concentration reduces the flexibility of the retail platform, leading to a decline in profits. Additionally, product durability and trade-in subsidy significantly influence supply chain profitability: high-durability products reduce renewal frequency, while trade-in subsidy effectively stimulates consumer demand and increase overall profits. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for companies implementing the trade-in strategy.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lozano-Oviedo J, Cortés C, Rey P, 2025, Sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chains and Their Optimization Models: A Review of the Literature. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(4): 999–1023.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Miao Z, Fu K, Xia Z, et al., 2017, Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Trade-Ins. Omega, 2017(66): 308–326.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Feng L, Li Y, Fan C, 2020, Optimization of Pricing and Quality Choice with the Coexistence of Secondary Market and Trade-In Program. Annals of Operation Research, 2020: 1–18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li S, Zheng B, 2022, Optimal Trade-In Strategy in the Presence of P2P Secondhand Market. Journal of Management Sciences, 25(7): 29–40.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li X, Xie J, Li T, 2023, Trade-In Strategy for Durable Products in the Presence of a Peer-To-Peer Second-Hand Marketplace. Annals of Operations Research, 326(1), 223–260.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cao K, Gong Y, Xu Y, et al., 2025, Optimal Trade-In Delegation Strategy Considering Third-Party Recycler Intrusion and Used Products with Different Durability. Operational Research, 25(1): 1–55.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guin S, Pal B, 2024, Dual Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination with Exchange Policy, Sales Efforts and Green Innovation under Uncertain Market. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 41(8): 748–771.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Arya A, Mittendorf B, 2006, Benefits of Channel Discord in the Sale of Durable Goods. Marketing Science, 25(1): 91–96.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Yang X, Shi V, et al., 2023, Partial Centralization in a Durable-Good Supply Chain. Production and Operations Management, 32(9): 2775–2787.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Chen Y, Liao Y, et al., 2025, Managing Strategic Inventories in a Three-Echelon Supply Chain of Durable Goods. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 2025(131): 103204.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
