<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v9i6.15444</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Research on the Protection of Rights and Interests of the Elderly from the Perspective of Digital Justice</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/9/6/10.26689/pbes.v9i6.15444</url><author>LiuWanliang</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-07-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>In the digital society, the concept of justice has transcended physical boundaries and extended into virtual spaces composed of data and algorithms. Due to the digital divide, algorithmic black boxes, and lack of ethical norms, the elderly are becoming a “digitally vulnerable group,” and the rights dilemmas they face are essentially a multidimensional digital injustice. This study uses digital justice as the analytical framework to reveal the composite violations suffered by the elderly in terms of data justice, algorithmic justice, and intergenerational justice, specifically manifested as the loss of information rights in data collection, technological exclusion in algorithmic decision-making, and structural imbalances in intergenerational resource allocation. In response, a stepwise protection system should be established from “relief” to “empowerment” and then to “reshaping.” At the relief level, traditional services should be preserved, and channels for rights protection should be kept open; at the empowerment level, differentiated digital literacy education should be implemented; at the restructuring level, algorithmic ethics review should be promoted, and intergenerational compensation mechanisms should be established. Through this stepped protection pathway, we can correct the unjust patterns in the digital realm, ensure that technological achievements fairly benefit all people, and ultimately achieve the grand goal of digital justice.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>National Bureau of Statistics, 2025, Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China 2024, viewed August 29, 2025, https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202502/t20250228_1958817.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>China Internet Network Information Center, 2025, The 55th “Statistical Report on the Development of China’s Internet, viewed August 30, 2025, https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2025/0117/c88-11229.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu M, Feng L, 2025, Intergenerational Equilibrium in the Digital Age and Its Justice Foundation. Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 3: 73.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rawls J, 2001, A Theory of Justice, [translated by He Huaihong, He Baogang, and Liao Shenbai], China Social Sciences Press, 86–89.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lin L, 2024, Realization of Rights for Vulnerable Groups from the Perspective of Digital Justice. Nanhai Law Journal, 4: 14.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Taylor L, 2017, What is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally. Big Data &amp; Society, 4(2): 1–14.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Luo Y, 2024, The Proposal and Justification of Algorithmic Justice. Beijing Social Sciences, 12: 49.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rawls J, 2001, A Theory of Justice, [translated by He Huaihong, He Baogang, and Liao Shenbai], China Social Sciences Press, 86–89.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sun J, 2019, Legal Regulation of Risks in Algorithmic Automated Decision-Making. Rule of Law Research, 4: 108.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cao R, 2003, Interpreting the Digital Divide—Technological Colonization and Social Differentiation, Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore Publishing House, 11th Edition, 18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liang C, 2025, Research on the Protection of Rights of Digitally Vulnerable Groups from the Perspective of Digital Justice—A Case Study of the Elderly. Theoretical Observation, 3: 97.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Supreme People’s Procuratorate, 2022, Typical Cases of Punishing Pension Fraud Crimes by Procuratorial Organs (Second Batch), viewed September 10, 2025, https://www.spp.gov.cn/spp/xwfbh/wsfbh/202211/t20221109_592264.shtml</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cheng X, 2023, The Algorithmic Black Box and Governance Landscape of Artificial Intelligence Platforms. Legal Forum, 2: 66.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang H, Zhang Z, 2022, From Algorithmic Black Box to Algorithmic Transparency: The Logic and Path of Government Algorithmic Governance. Journal of Guizhou University (Social Sciences Edition), 4: 66.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fan Y, Zhang Y, 2022, Research on the Protection of Fundamental Rights of Vulnerable Groups in the ‘Digital Divide.’ Journal of Hubei University of Economics (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 12: 89.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xi J, 2022, Holding High the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and United in Struggle for the Comprehensive Construction of a Modern Socialist Country, Report at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, People’s Daily, October 26, 2022.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>People’s Court Daily, 2020, December 3, 2020, Page 002 News · Commentary.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang W, 2019, No Numbers, No Human Rights, Beijing Daily, September 2, 2019.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chinese Government Website, 2023, Interim Measures for the Administration of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services, July 10, 2023.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
