PBESProceedings of Business and Economic Studies2209-26412209-265XBio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/pbes.v9i6.15471ArticleESG-Integrated Performance Evaluation of Regional PPP Infrastructure Projects: An Analytical Framework Based on the Entropy-TOPSIS Modelhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/9/6/10.26689/pbes.v9i6.15471ShyngJyh-Harng2026962026-07-15Public-Private Partnership (PPP) models play a pivotal role in advancing infrastructure development at the local level, particularly in town and rural areas. Scientific, comprehensive, and objective performance evaluation of such projects is crucial for optimizing resource allocation and enhancing long-term sustainability. This study introduces the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework to construct a multidimensional evaluation index system. The Entropy Method is employed to determine objective indicator weights, combined with the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), to evaluate several typical local town and rural PPP construction projects in Guangdong. The evaluation results clearly demonstrate project performance rankings, identify key strengths and weaknesses, and provide theoretical and practical references for project performance management and ESG-oriented optimization of PPP models.

Liu P, Han A, 2025, The Neo-Endogenous Development Perspective of Stakeholders and Their Synergy in Rural Revitalization. Environment Development and Sustainability. DOI:10.1007/s10668-025-06001-0.

Guo Y, Li S, 2024, A Policy Analysis Of China’s Sustainable Rural Revitalization: Integrating Environmental, Social and Economic Dimensions. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2024.1436869.

Yang Y, Kidokoro T, Seta F, et al., 2023, Are Local Residents Benefiting from the Latest Urbanization Dynamic in China? China’s Characteristic Town Strategy from a Resident Perspective: Evidence from Two Cases in Hangzhou. Land. DOI:10.3390/land12020510.

Shiferaw BA, Okello J, Reddy RV, 2007, Adoption and Adaptation of Natural Resource Management Innovations in Smallholder Agriculture: Reflections on Key Lessons and Best Practices. Environment Development and Sustainability, 11(3): 601–619. DOI:10.1007/s10668-007-9132-1.

Chang CH, Chang YY, Lu PH, 2017, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Infection Following Autologous Fat Grafting on the Face. Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 38(1): NP1–NP5. DOI:10.1093/asj/sjx168.

Salehi KR, 2023, Rural Cooperatives Social Responsibility in Promoting Sustainability-Oriented Activities in the Agricultural Sector: Nexus of Community, Enterprise, and Government. Sustainable Futures. DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2023.100150.

Lee HPJ, 2018, The Impact of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Rural Sustainability in Korea. Sustainability. DOI:10.3390/su10072436.

Yang RN, 2022, Who Is Willing to Participate in Local Governance? Modernization of Shared Governance in China. Sustainability. DOI:10.3390/su142214899.

Smith CS, 2002, Research and the Realities of the Industry. arq-Architectural Research Quarterly, 6(2): 101–106. DOI:10.1017/s1359135502261552.

Wu M, 2013, Towards a Stakeholder Perspective on Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Biometrics. DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v8n4p20.

Yang J, Zuo Z, Li Y, et al., 2024, Manufacturing Enterprises Move Towards Sustainable Development: ESG Performance, Market-Based Environmental Regulation, and Green Technological Innovation. Journal of Environmental Management, 372: 123244. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123244.

Zou M, Gao Y, Ma H, et al., 2025, Does Digital Village Construction Promote Rural Residents’ Happiness? Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. DOI:10.3389/fsufs.2025.1518819.

Guo, Yang X, Y H W, 2022, The Collaboration Mechanism of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Dominated by Farmer Cooperatives. Sustainability. DOI:10.3390/su14105824.