<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">PBES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Proceedings of Business and Economic Studies</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2209-2641</issn><eissn>2209-265X</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/pbes.v9i7.15693</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>ESG Rating Divergence and Corporate Green Innovation: Review and Prospects</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/PBES/9/7/10.26689/pbes.v9i7.15693</url><author>YangZongqin</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-07-28</published-time></date></history><abstract>Against the backdrop of the accelerating global green and low-carbon transition, ESG ratings have emerged as a pivotal tool for assessing corporate sustainability performance. However, the considerable divergence in ESG evaluations across rating agencies introduces uncertainty into ESG investment markets, disrupts stakeholder judgment and decision-making, and subsequently influences corporate resource allocation and strategic choices, ultimately shaping corporate green innovation. Adopting a literature review perspective, this paper systematically synthesizes the concept and economic consequences of ESG rating divergence, summarizes the connotation and determinants of corporate green innovation, and summarizes the heterogeneous findings regarding their relationship. On this basis, this paper identifies the limitations of existing research and outlines future directions, with the aim of providing useful references for subsequent studies.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yao S, Chen G, 2024, Can ESG Rating Divergence Drive Substantial Green Innovation? Finance and Economy, (6): 50–59 + 73.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zeng Y, Wang Y, Wu Z, 2024, ESG Rating Disagreement and Corporate Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China’s A-Share Listed Companies. Soft Science, 38(11): 72–78.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou Z, Gu W, San Z, 2023, ESG Rating Divergence and Analysts’ Earnings Forecast Accuracy. China Soft Science, (10): 164–176.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Shao Y, Zhang G, Zhang Y, 2025, ESG Rating Divergence and Stock Price Crash Risk: Noise Effect or Information Effect? Journal of Audit &amp; Economics, 40(1): 84–94.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tan R, Pan L, 2023, ESG Rating Disagreement, External Attention and Stock Return: Evidence from China. Economics Letters, 231.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao H, He Z, Banerjee T, et al., 2026, ESG Rating Divergence and Firm Value: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters, 33(11): 1796–1802.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rajna B G, Philipp K, Steffen P S, 2021, ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4): 104–127.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yu D, 2024, ESG Performance and Corporate Environmental Performance: Effect Evaluation and Mechanism Test. Modern Economic Research, (10): 91–103 + 132.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhen Y, Sun W, 2025, ESG Rating Divergence and Corporate Green Innovation. Science &amp; Technology Progress and Policy, 42(6): 57–67.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma L, Zhuo S, 2026, Environmental Regulation and Green Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Green Finance and Executive Green Perception. Journal of Innovation &amp; Knowledge, 14: 100954.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu B, Lu J, Ju T, 2023, Formalism or Substantialism: Research on Green Innovation under Soft Market Supervision of ESG Rating. Nankai Business Review, 26(5): 16–28.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Huang L, 2025, Executive Team Stability, Equity Incentives, and Corporate Green Innovation. Financial Theory &amp; Practice, (5): 108–118.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hu Y, Dai G, 2024, Digital Transformation, Market Competition and Corporate Green Innovation. Statistics &amp; Decision, 40(7): 161–166.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang S, Li Y, Ge W, 2026, ESG Rating Disagreement, Executive Environmental Background, and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 90: 109425.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li J, Li Y, 2024, Research on the Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on the Efficiency of Green Innovation in Enterprises. Journal of Industrial Technology and Economy, 43(10): 119–128.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li Q, Chen L, 2024, Impact Research of ESG Ratings Uncertainty on Corporate Green Innovation. Chinese Journal of Management, 21(12): 1820–829.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu F, Xu X, Sun J, 2024, The Short Board Effect of ESG Rating and Corporate Green Innovation Activities. PloS One, 19(3): e0299795.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
