<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4040</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Practice Theory in International Relations</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/4/6/10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4040</url><author>HeGang</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2022-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper reviews the practice turn in the international relations studies, and the development of its related theories. This paper, particularly focuses on the use of practice theory from different perspectives, further proposed a new hypothesis for the practice theory. In the future, this research may provide an idea for the development of the practice theory.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pouliot V, 2008, “The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities.” International Organization, 62(2): 257-288.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wendt A, 2000, Translated by Qin Yaqing, Social Theory of International Politics. Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group, 231.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Neumann IB, 2002, “Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 31(3): 627-651.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu L, Nie W, 2010, “The ‘Practical Turn’ in International Relations Theory,” in World Economy and Politics. 2010(8): 98-115.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nissen RA, 2013, Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge, 25.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bourdieu P, 2003, Translated by Jiang Zhuahua, Le Sens Pratique. Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House, 80.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nissen RA, 2013, “Introduction,” In Rebecca Adler-Nissen (eds.) Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. London: Routledge, 11.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lave J, 2004, Translated by Wang Wenjing, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wenger E, 1999, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Adler E, 2005, Communitarian International Relations: The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. Routledge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Latour B, Woolgar S, 2013, Laboratory Life. Princeton University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bueger C, Gadinger F, 2007, “Reassembling and Dissecting: International Relations Practice from a Science Studies Perspective.” International Studies Perspectives, 8(1): 90-110.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Mayer M, 2012, “Chaotic Climate Change and Security.” International Political Sociology, 6(2): 165-185.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Boltanski L, 2022, Love and Justice as Competences. Cambridge: Polity Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Thevenot L, 2007, “The Plurality of Cognitive Formats and Engagements: Moving between the Familiar and the Public.” European Journal of Social Theory, 10(3): 409-423.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhu LQ, 2011, China’s Participation in the International System: An Explanatory Model for Practice. Foreign Affairs Review, 2011(1): 19.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wendt A, 1994, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” The American Political Science Review, 88(2): 384-396.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Giddens A, 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bhaskar R, 1979, The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Brighton: Harvester.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Archer MS, 1982, “Morphogenesis versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.” The British Journal of Sociology, 33(4): 455-483.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
