<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4072</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Doubts about Michael Slote’s Ethics of Empathy and its Responses</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/4/6/10.26689/ssr.v4i6.4072</url><author>Yang-YinLinghan</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2022-06-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>Throughout the history of western ethics, there has been a ceaseless debate between rationalism and sentimentalism. The two normative movements which born from the debate have caught our attention. The first one happened in the late 19th century, as represented by Kantian deontology and utilitarianism. Meanwhile, the other one is the revival movement of virtue ethics initiated by Hursthouse, MacIntyre, Michael Slote (Slote), and others, discussing the normativity and rationality of virtue ethics. During the second normative movement of virtue ethics, Slote proposed moral sentimentalism based on the ethics of empathy, which made him the focus on the academic attention. The doubts about the Ethics of Empathy constructed by Slote falls under three aspects, which are the concept of empathy, the process of empathy argumentation, and the reliability of using empathy ethics to answer Hume’s problem. Meticulous research on these doubts and Slote’s responses to them can help us to understand better on the construction of his ethical thoughts, their contributions, and limitations, which the author believes, is essential for the current development of moral sentimentalism.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slote M. Trans, Han CY, 2020, Moral from Motive, Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slote M. Trans, Zhou L, 2017, From Morality to Virtue, Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen Z, 2009, Contemporary Western Normative Ethics, Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen Z, 2013, Study on Michael Slote’s Moral Sentimentalism. Philosophical Researches, 2013(6): 102-110.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen Z, 2016, How Does Michael Slote Derive “Ought” from “Is”? Studies in Ethics, 2016(4): 33-40.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hong R, 1993, Michael Slote’s Morality. Social Sciences Abroad, 1993(6): 60-63.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Das R. Tran, Chen Z, 2004, Virtue Ethics and Right Action. Seeking Truth, 2004(31): 15-24.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Slote M, 2010, Moral Sentimentalism, London: Oxford University Press.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
