SSRScientific and Social Research2661-43322981-9946Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ssr.v6i2.6249ArticleConceptual Design of Transparent Machine Behavior to Facilitate Human-Machine Drivinghttps://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/6/2/10.26689/ssr.v6i2.6249FangWei-xuan,YangWei-guang2024622024-02-27To facilitate human-machine driving, the functions of the intelligent system need to be displayed clearly to the driver. In this way, the driver will be able to understand the goals, plans, and decisions of the intelligent system. In addition to internal states, the transparency of external states such as the level of control during automated driving is also important. However, the current autonomous driving systems do not allow visibility of the tangible state of the intelligent system. Therefore, we designed a Human Machine Interface (HMI) concept that makes the machine’s behavior visible through virtual changes on the steering wheel, foot pedals, and turn signals. In this way, the lack of awareness of the driver due to the loss of tactile feedback from the vehicle can be compensated, and the driver will be able to observe and predict the behavior of the system, resulting in a better human-machine driving experience.

Novakazi F, Johansson M, Strömberg H, et al., 2021, Levels of What? Investigating Drivers’ Understanding of Different Levels of Automation in Vehicles. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 15(2–3): 116–132.

Muhammad K, Ullah A, Lloret J, et al., 2020, Deep Learning for Safe Autonomous Driving: Current Challenges and Future Directions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(7): 4316–4336.

Merat N, Seppelt B, Louw T, et al., 2018, The “Out-of-the-Loop” Concept in Automated Driving: Proposed Definition, Measures and Implications. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1): 87–98. https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0525-8

Endsley MR, 2017, From Here to Autonomy: Lessons Learned from Human-Automation Research. The Journal of the Human Factors Society, 59(1): 5–27.

Yang C, Zhu Y, Chen Y, 2021, A Review of Human-Machine Cooperation in the Robotics Domain. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(1): 12–25.

Dikmen M, Burns CM, 2016, Autonomous Driving in the Real World: Experiences with Tesla Autopilot and Summon. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 225–228.

Nafees MN, Saxena N, Cardenas A, et al., 2023, Smart Grid Cyber-Physical Situational Awareness of Complex Operational Technology Attacks: A Review. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(10): 1–36.

Dorneich MC, Ververs PM, Mathan S, et al., 2012, Considering Etiquette in the Design of an Adaptive System. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 6(2): 243–265.

Manchon JB, Bueno M, Navarro J, 2023, Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 65(8): 1613–1629.

Lee J, Rheem H, Lee JD, et al., 2023, Teaming with Your Car: Redefining the Driver-Automation Relationship in Highly Automated Vehicles. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 17(1): 49-74.

Jean-Michel H, 2001, Towards a cognitive approach to human-machine cooperation in dynamic situations. International journal of human-computer studies 54(4): 509–540.

Ivanov SH, 2023, Automated Decision-Making. Foresight, 25(1): 4–19.

Zhang T, Yang J, Liang N, et al., 2023, Physiological Measurements of Situation Awareness: A Systematic Review. Human Factors, 65(5): 737–758.

Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, 2021, viewed June 13, 2021, https://www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_202104