<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v6i4.6838</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Judicial Personal Values and Decision-Making</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/6/4/10.26689/ssr.v6i4.6838</url><author>TaoHao</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2024-04-29</published-time></date></history><abstract>This paper briefly describes the background of Justice Callinan’s view in the case of Cattanach v Melchior, subsequently exploring the existence and role of judicial personal values in sentencing from several legal theories, legal experiments, and specific case studies. The paper also illustrates the merits of judicial personal values and critiques some opposing views. Finally, it is concluded that expressing judicial personal values enhances persuasiveness and provides better guidance for the development of the law, which in turn fosters legal decision-making.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cattanach v Melchior, 2003, 215 CLR 1, https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2003/38.html</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Maxeiner JR, 2008, Some Realism about Legal Certainty in the Globalization of the Rule of Law. Houston Journal of International Law, 31(1): 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3749-7_4</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cohen DS, 1998, Chief Justice Nemetz’s Judicial Record: Judicial Decision-Making and Judicial Values. University of British Columbia Law Review, 23(1): 97–98.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Callaghan RJCO, 2013, The Influence of Personal Values on Legal Judgments. Journal of Law and Society, 40(4): 596¬–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00642.x</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kramer MH, 2009, Naturalizing Jurisprudence: Essays on American Legal Realism and Naturalism in Legal Philosophy Book Review. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 3(1): 107–110.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Biderman PL, 1996, Of Vulcans and Values: Judicial Decision-Making and Implications for Judicial Education. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47(3): 64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1996.tb00838.x</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gordon RW, 1986, Critical Legal Studies Symposium on Humanistic Legal Studies, Critical Legal Studies and the Marxist Sociology of Law. Legal Studies Forum, 10(3): 335–338.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schwartz S, 2012, An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values, Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/11</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Waldron J, Cheng H, Chen C, 2009, The Core of the Case against Judicial Review Theoretical Discussion. US-China Law Review, 6(10): 30–33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Black D, Unger RM, 1977, Rationalist and Normative Approaches to the Sociological Study of Law Review Essays. Law &amp; Society Review, 12(1): 142–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053323</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>David Wood Associate, 2001, Community Values and Judicial Decisions. Journal of Judicial Administration, 11(1): 43–45.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
