SSRScientific and Social Research2661-43322981-9946Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ssr.v7i11.13086ArticleA Brief Analysis of the Development Context and Theoretical Concerns of Literary Anthropologyhttps://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/7/11/10.26689/ssr.v7i11.13086MaTengyue,ShenJing20257112025-12-12The disciplinary practice of literary anthropology is mainly reflected in the two directions of the anthropologicalization of literature and the literaryization of anthropology. In this process of transformation and integration, the expansion of the category of “text”, the sharing of the methodology of “field”, and the construction of “expression” have become the core discourse of literary anthropology. On this basis, the practical research of literature also provides a new ideological path for the theoretical development of literary anthropology.

Ye SX, Xu XJ, Peng ZR, 2018, Presentation of Literary Anthropology Research. Journal of Baise University, 2018(2): 15–16.

Ye SX, 2018, A Preliminary Exploration into Literary Anthropology. Shaanxi Normal University Press, Shaanxi, 3–4.

Frye N, 1957, Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 342.

Frye N, 1957, Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 95 + 100 + 134 + 342.

Frye N, 1957, Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 341.

Geertz C, 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 16.

Geertz C, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, 5.

Tang QC, Ye SX, 2019, New Theory of Literary Anthropology—Two Major Turns in Interdisciplinary Disciplines. Fudan University Press, Fudan, 3–18.

Geertz C, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, 29.

Geertz C, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, 9–10.

Geertz C, 1973, The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, 5.

Iser W, 1989, Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology. Johns Hopkins University Press, London, 262–284.

Iser W, 1993, The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Johns Hopkins University Press, London, ix–xix.

Poyatos F, 1988, Literary Anthropology: A New Interdisciplinary Approach to People, Signs and Literature. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, xi–xvi.

Yu LM, 2016, The Ancient and Modern Interpretation of the Concept of “Literature” and the Writing of Chinese Literary History. Chinese Language and Literature Research, 2016(2): 77–85.

Ye SX, 2010, Literary Anthropology Tutorial. China Social Sciences Press, Beijing, 21.

Li YY, 1998, The Formation of Literary Anthropology. Chinese and Foreign Culture and Literary Theory, 1998(5): 91–94.

Fang KQ, 1992, Literary Anthropological Criticism. Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press, Shanghai, 9.

Xiao B, 1997, The Return of “Humanology”: Experimental Report on Literary Anthropology. Journal of Huaiyin Normal College, 1997(1): 68.

Ye SX, 2009, The Mythical History of China — From “Chinese Mythology” to “Mythical China”. Journal of Baise University, 2009(1): 33–37.

Tang QC, Ye SX, 2019, New Theory of Literary Anthropology: Two Major Turns in Interdisciplinary Disciplines. Fudan University Press, Shanghai, 255.

Ye SX, Zhang ML, Liu QY, 2013, Cultural Semiotics: New Visions of Large and Small Traditions. Shaanxi Normal University Press, Shaanxi, 33–36.

Ye SX, 2018, Qiang People Are still White and Xia People Are still Black — Examples of the Four-fold Evidence Method in Cultural Text Research. Literary Anthropology Research, 2018(1): 51–81.

Li YP, 2019, The Literary Anthropology Perspective of the Cultural Tradition. Shaanxi Normal University Press, Shaanxi, 15–21.

Xu XJ, 2001, Literary Anthropology: Compatibility and Development in Sino-Western Exchanges. Ideological Front, 2001(4): 104–105.

Ye SX, Peng ZR, Xu XJ, 2011, The Multiple Meanings of “Anthropological Writing”—Three “Turns” and Four Issues. Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences (Social Science Edition), 2011(2): 40–41.

Li F, 2009, Paradigm Shift and Theoretical Advancement of Literary Anthropology Research in the New Era. Literary Theory Research, 2009(3): 19–24.

Tang QC, Ye SX, 2019, New Theory of Literary Anthropology: Two Major Interdisciplinary Turns. Fudan University Press, Shanghai, 126.

Chen HL, Wang M, 2022, Text Reflection and Expression Construction: The Evolution of Chinese Literary Anthropology Theory and the Possibility of Literary Practice Research. Journal of Ethnology, 2022(8): 89.

De Angelis R, 2003, Between Anthropology and Literature. Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2.

Tang QC, Ye SX, 2019, New Theory of Literary Anthropology: Two Major Interdisciplinary Turns. Fudan University Press, Shanghai, 173.

Chen HL, Wang M, 2022, Text Reflection and Expression Construction: The Evolution of Chinese Literary Anthropology Theory and the Possibility of Literary Practice Research. Journal of Ethnology, 2022(8): 89–90.

Marcuse GE, Fischer MMJ, 1998, Anthropology as Cultural Criticism—An Era of Experimentation in the Humanities, translated by Wang Mingming and Lan Daju. Life·Reading·Xinzhi Sanlian Bookstore, Beijing, 22.

Iser W, 1993, Toward Literary Anthropology, in The Future of Literary Theory, translated by Cheng Xilin et al. China Social Sciences Press, Beijing, 279.

Iser W, 1993, The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Johns Hopkins University Press, London, xviii–xix + 281–296.

Poyatos F, 1988, Literary Anthropology: A New Interdisciplinary Approach to People, Signs and Literature. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 6–10.

Xu XJ, 2011, Problems of Expression: The Starting Point and Core of Literary Anthropology — Written for the Fifth Annual Conference of the Chinese Literary Anthropology Research Association. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2011(1): 149–154.

Xu XJ, 2011, Problems of Expression: The Starting Point and Core of Literary Anthropology — Written for the Fifth Annual Conference of the Chinese Literary Anthropology Research Association. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2011(1): 152–153.

Wang MM, 2008, The Native Perspective of Anthropology — Comment on Pan Yingnian’s “Consciousness in the Fields”. Journal of Baise University, 21(6): 45–47.

Yang CZ, 2004, Anthropological Interpretation of Pan Yingnian’s Novels. Ethnic Literature Research, 2004(3): 51–55.

Liu LL, 2010, The Nature and Action of Literary Anthropology Writing — A Review of Aku Wuwu’s Anthropological Prose Collection “The Curse of the Divine Witch”. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 31(2): 74–81.

Qiu S, 2020, Towards the Era of Digital Intelligence: Experimental Writing of Aku Wuwu Weibo Fragments. Journal of Northern University for Nationalities: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2020(2): 136–141.

Peng ZR, 2010, Ethnographic “Writing”: Narratives Wandering Between Science and Poetics, in Anthropological Writing. Sichuan University Press, Chengdu, 7–18.

Ye SX, 2013, N-level Coding of Cultural Texts—An Overall Interpretation Strategy from “Big Tradition” to “Little Tradition”. Journal of Baise University, 26(1): 1.

Chen HL, 2022, Textual Reflection and Expression Construction: The Evolution of Chinese Literary Anthropology Theory and the Possibility of Literary Practice Research. Journal of Ethnology, 2022(8): 94.

Chen HL, 2022, Textual Reflection and Expression Construction: The Evolution of Chinese Literary Anthropology Theory and the Possibility of Literary Practice Research. Journal of Ethnology, 2022(8): 95.

Chen HL, 2022, Textual Reflection and Expression Construction: The Evolution of Chinese Literary Anthropology Theory and the Possibility of Literary Practice Research. Journal of Ethnology, 2022(8): 95–96.