<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v7i6.10523</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>News Framing Analysis of Local Government’s Internet Public Opinion Crisis and Media Coverage: A Case Study of the Qingdao Prawn Incident</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/7/6/10.26689/ssr.v7i6.10523</url><author>QuXueyu</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-06-13</published-time></date></history><abstract>Utilizing news frame theory, this study analyzed the media coverage of the Qingdao prawn incident. It examined the attribution of responsibility to local government and restaurant owners, along with the framing of the local government’s response. Out of 199 analyzed news reports, 28.6% emphasized the local government’s responsibility, and 22.6% highlighted the restaurant owners’. In terms of the local government’s response frames, negative responses were most prevalent at 21.1%, followed by positive (15.1%) and neutral (12.6%) frames. The data suggests that the media often holds the local government most accountable in public opinion crises, attributing significant blame to restaurant owners. The prevalence of negative framing indicates a bias towards critical coverage. Given the scarcity of neutral reporting, the need for balanced, objective reporting that scrutinizes the root causes and truth of events such as the Qingdao prawn incident is highlighted rather than adhering to superficial or biased narratives.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang L, Zhang N, 2020, Effectiveness of Trust Repair Strategies in the Crisis of Corporate Internet Public Opinion. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 5(1): 10–18.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L, 2013, Social Media and Political Communication: A Social Media Analytics Framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2013(3): 1277–1291.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Schudson M, 2001, The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism. Journalism, 2(2): 149–170.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>De Vreese CH, 2005, News Framing: Theory and Typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1): 51–62.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Carragee KM, Roefs W, 2004, The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research. Journal of Communication, 54(2): 214–233.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tang L, Fan B, Li C, et al., 2022, Empirical Evaluation of the Environmental Emergency Management Capability of Local Governments in China. Sustainability, 14(11): 6760.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Littlefield RS, Quenette AM, 2007, Crisis Leadership and Hurricane Katrina: The Portrayal of Authority by the Media in Natural Disasters. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35(1): 26–47.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kosho J, 2016, Media Influence on Public Opinion Attitudes Toward the Migration Crisis. International Journal of Scientific &amp; Technology Research, 5(5): 86–91.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kumpel AS, 2022, Social Media Information Environments and their Implications for the Uses and Effects of News: The PINGS Framework. Communication Theory, 32(2): 223–242.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Berinsky AJ, Kinder DR, 2006, Making Sense of Issues through Media Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis. The Journal of Politics, 68(3): 640–656.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Linstrom M, Marais W, 2012, Qualitative News Frame Analysis: A Methodology. Communitas, 2012(17): 21–38.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Johansson C, 2007, Goffman’s Sociology: An Inspiring Resource for Developing Public Relations Theory. Public Relations Review, 33(3): 275–280.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Carter MJ, 2013, The Hermeneutics of Frames and Framing: An Examination of the Media’s Construction of Reality. Sage Open, 3(2): 2158244013487915.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Scheufele, DA, 2000, Agenda-setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication. Mass Communication &amp; Society, 3(2–3): 297–316.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pan Z, Kosicki GM, 1993, Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse. Political Communication, 10(1): 55–75.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dan V, Ihlen O, Raknes K, 2020, Political Public Relations and Strategic Framing: Underlying Mechanisms, Success Factors, and Impact, in Political Public Relations. Taylor &amp; Francis, Oxfordshire.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Reese SD, Gandy J, Grant AE, 2001, Prologue—Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research, in Framing Public Life. Routledge, Oxfordshire, 23–48.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hertog JK, McLeod DM, 2001, A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide, in Framing Public Life. Routledge, Oxfordshire, 157–178.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Nilsson S, Enander A, 2020, “Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don’t”: Media Frames of Responsibility and Accountability in Handling a Wildfire. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 28(1): 69–82.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Glavanicova D, Pascucci M, 2019, Formal Analysis of Responsibility Attribution in a Multimodal Framework. PRIMA 2019: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems: 22nd International Conference, Proceedings 22, 36–51.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Potter WJ, Riddle K, 2007, A Content Analysis of the Media Effects Literature. Journalism &amp; Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(1): 90–104.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Franzosi R, 2008, Content Analysis: Objective, Systematic, and Quantitative Description of Content. Content Analysis, 1(1): 21–49.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Prasad BD, 2008, Content Analysis. Research Methods for Social Work, 2008(5): 1–20.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Weber W, Rall HM, 2017, Authenticity in Comics Journalism. Visual Strategies for Reporting Facts. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 8(4): 376–397.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
