<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v7i8.12018</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Artificial Intelligence and Social Interaction: Evidence from Gift Money Expenditure</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/7/8/10.26689/ssr.v7i8.12018</url><author>HanZiyu</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-09-17</published-time></date></history><abstract>As artificial intelligence proliferates rapidly, understanding its impact on social interaction patterns becomes critical. Using national survey data and gift money expenditure as a proxy for social interaction, the study employs instrumental variable methods to identify the causal effect of AI use on individual social behavior. The study documents three key findings. First, AI use significantly reduces traditional social interaction through substitution effects, with instrumental variable estimates showing that OLS substantially underestimates the true magnitude, confirming the technology substitution hypothesis. Second, diminished social willingness serves as a key mediating mechanism—AI use reduces social behavior by weakening non-family social preferences, demonstrating how technology shapes behavior through preference channels. Third, the substitution effect exhibits significant demographic heterogeneity, with younger, more educated, and higher-income individuals displaying greater sensitivity to technology adoption, consistent with digital divide patterns. These findings provide micro-empirical evidence of social relationship transformation in the digital era. The results suggest policymakers should emphasize social inclusiveness in AI adoption while promoting balanced development between digital innovation and traditional social engagement.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, et al., 2006, A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence: August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4): 12–14.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chui M, Cam A, Hall B, 2019, Global AI Survey: AI Proves Its Worth, but Few Scale Impact. McKinsey &amp; Company, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rao AS, Verweij G, 2017, Sizing the Prize: What’s the Real Value of AI for Your Business and How Can You Capitalise? PwC Publication, London.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xie XM, Guo XH, 2024, How Do Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning Platforms Achieve Open Innovation. China Industrial Economics, 2024(8): 174–192.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Trajtenberg M, 2018, AI as the Next GPT: A Political-Economy Perspective (NBER Working Paper No. 24245). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kromann L, Malchow-Møller N, Skaksen JR, et al., 2020, Automation and Productivity: A Cross-Country, Cross-Industry Comparison. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(2): 265–287.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Alguacil M, Cuadros A, Orts V, 2022, Inward FDI and Import Demand for Intermediate Inputs: The Role of Backward Linkages and Technology Transfer. Review of World Economics, 158(2): 307–335.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Acemoglu D, Restrepo P, 2018, Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work (NBER Working Paper No. 24196). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Frey CB, Osborne MA, 2017, The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017(114): 254–280.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Cai YZ, Chen N, 2019, Artificial Intelligence and High-Quality Growth and Employment Under the New Technological Revolution. The Journal of Quantitative &amp; Technical Economics, 36(5): 3–22.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhao ZJ, Zhuang XY, 2023, High-Quality Development of Artificial Intelligence in China: Current Situation, Problems and Strategies. Reform, 2023(9): 11–20.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yao JQ, Zhang KP, Guo LP, et al., 2024, How Does Artificial Intelligence Improve Enterprise Production Efficiency? From the Perspective of Labor Skill Structure Adjustment. Management World, 2024(2): 101–116.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li G, Bai YP, 2024, How Does Artificial Intelligence Application Affect Manufacturing Enterprise Innovation Performance? Finance &amp; Economics, 2024(12): 102–112.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang BW, Ma FH, 2024, How Does Intelligent Manufacturing Enhance Supply Chain Resilience: Theoretical Mechanism and Empirical Test. Economic Perspectives, 2024(11): 20–37.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen YB, Lin C, Chen XL, 2019, Artificial Intelligence, Aging and Economic Growth. Economic Research Journal, 54(7): 47–63.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wu J, Huang JY, 2023, Culture and Intergenerational Entrepreneurship in Family Businesses: Cultural Embedding in Intergenerational Inheritance. China Industrial Economics, 2023(11): 174–192.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Manski CF, 2000, Economic Analysis of Social Interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3): 115–136.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Brown JR, Ivković Z, Smith PA, et al., 2008, Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation. The Journal of Finance, 63(3): 1509–1531.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li T, 2006, Social Interaction, Information Channels and Household Stock Market Participation. Economic Research Journal, 2006(1): 34–44.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sun WJ, Lin HM, 2018, Financial Exclusion, Social Interaction and Household Asset Allocation. Journal of Central University of Finance &amp; Economics, 2018(3): 21–38.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B21" content-type="article"><label>21</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu H, Ma WH, 2017, Social Interaction and Household Capital Market Participation Behavior in the Internet Era. Studies of International Finance, 2017(3): 55–66.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B22" content-type="article"><label>22</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Yang H, Zhang K, 2020, Cognitive Ability, Social Interaction Modes and Household Asset Choice: Empirical Analysis Based on China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) Data. Investment Research, 39(5): 67–81.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B23" content-type="article"><label>23</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Guo JY, Wang YY, Wang CX, 2023, The Impact and Mechanism of Social Interaction on Rural Residents’ Online Shopping Behavior. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Social Sciences), 24(6): 45–54.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B24" content-type="article"><label>24</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li D, Ding JS, Ma S, 2019, The Impact of Social Interaction on Household Commercial Insurance Participation: Empirical Analysis from China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) Data. Studies of International Finance, 2019(7): 96–114.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B25" content-type="article"><label>25</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ma XL, 2024, Micro-Test of Internet Development’s Impact on Urban-Rural Consumption Gap: Considering the Mediating Role of Residents’ Income and Social Interaction. Commercial Research, 2024(2): 51–54.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B26" content-type="article"><label>26</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Putnam RD, 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon &amp; Schuster, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B27" content-type="article"><label>27</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Turkle S, 2011, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books, New York.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B28" content-type="article"><label>28</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Acemoglu D, Restrepo P, 2020, Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6): 2188–2244.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B29" content-type="article"><label>29</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhang H, Gao ZH, Xu Y, 2024, The Impact Mechanism of AI Technology Substitution Perception on Human-AI Cooperation Willingness in the Workplace. Soft Science, 38(3): 107–114.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B30" content-type="article"><label>30</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wei W, 2022, Research on the Differentiation of Artificial Intelligence Employment Substitution Effects and Innovation Effects. Soft Science, 36(3): 55–61.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B31" content-type="article"><label>31</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang LH, Hu SM, Dong ZQ, 2022, Artificial Intelligence Technology, Task Attributes and Occupational Substitution Risk: Empirical Evidence from Micro-Level. Management World, 38(7): 60–79.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B32" content-type="article"><label>32</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B33" content-type="article"><label>33</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhan XJ, Wan Y, Li ZC, et al., 2025, Research on the Impact Mechanism of Gig Workers’ Self-Leadership on Proactive Service Behavior from the Perspective of Social Cognitive Theory. Chinese Journal of Management, 22(1): 65–73.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B34" content-type="article"><label>34</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang XP, Zhong RY, 2025, Research on the Impact Mechanism of New Media Contact on Depression in the Elderly: Empirical Research Based on Social Cognitive Theory. Journal of Yunnan Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 42(3): 62–71.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B35" content-type="article"><label>35</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hu XY, 2024, Media Literacy Deficiency and Penetration of Silver-Haired Groups in the New Media Era: Discussion Based on the Perspective of Digital Divide Theory. Journalism &amp; Communication, 2024(1): 49–51.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B36" content-type="article"><label>36</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu WB, Li PW, 2022, Research on the Impact of Social Interaction on Chinese Urban Household Out-of-School Education Expenditure: Based on CFPS2018 Cross-Sectional Data. Education &amp; Economy, 38(6): 56–65.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B37" content-type="article"><label>37</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Rosen LD, Whaling K, Carrier LM, et al., 2013, The Media and Technology Usage and Attitudes Scale: An Empirical Investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6): 2501–2511.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B38" content-type="article"><label>38</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Araujo T, Wonneberger A, Neijens P, et al., 2017, How Much Time Do You Spend Online? Understanding and Improving the Accuracy of Self-Reported Measures of Internet Use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3): 173–190.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B39" content-type="article"><label>39</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Junco R, 2013, Comparing Actual and Self-Reported Measures of Facebook Use. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3): 626–631.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B40" content-type="article"><label>40</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Araujo T, Boeschoten L, Oberski DL, et al., 2023, Digital Trace Data Collection for Social Media Effects Research: APIs, Data Donation, and (Screen) Tracking. Communication Methods and Measures, 17(2): 89–110.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B41" content-type="article"><label>41</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Marres N, 2017, Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Polity Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B42" content-type="article"><label>42</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Tian ZF, Li T, Fu L, 2022, Family Relationships and Household Consumption. Economic Research Journal, 57(6): 173–190.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B43" content-type="article"><label>43</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jiang T, 2022, Mediation Effects and Moderation Effects in Causal Inference Empirical Research. China Industrial Economics, 2022(5): 100–120.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B44" content-type="article"><label>44</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Skågeby J, 2010, Gift-Giving as a Conceptual Framework: Framing Social Behavior in Online Networks. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2): 170–177.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B45" content-type="article"><label>45</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Li QQ, Fan YW, Song WJ, 2021, Research on the Impact of Social Context on Interest in Experiential Consumption Participation. Nankai Business Review, 24(3): 4–17.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B46" content-type="article"><label>46</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Feng DW, Gao MT, Zhou L, 2022, Internet and Urban-Rural Consumption Gap: Evidence from Household Micro-Survey. China Economic Studies, 2022(3): 98–114.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B47" content-type="article"><label>47</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ramulu B, Justin P, 2023, Social Influence Research in Consumer Behavior: What We Learned and What We Need to Learn?—A Hybrid Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Business Research, 2023(162): 113916.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B48" content-type="article"><label>48</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Liu SH, Zhang X, Zhu XH, et al., 2020, Empirical Research on Rural Education Oriented to Scientific Decision-Making. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 38(9): 103–118.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B49" content-type="article"><label>49</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lin X, Xie JY, Lin SX, 2022, Research on the Impact of Mobile Internet Use on Different Consumption Categories of Rural Households: Empirical Analysis Based on 2018 CFPS Data. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2022(2): 113–123.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B50" content-type="article"><label>50</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sun DY, Wang SS, Liang F, 2025, How Do Cultural Consumption Policies Affect Rural Household Consumption? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Cultural Consumption Pilot Policies. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2025(3): 128–138.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B51" content-type="article"><label>51</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen L, Gao YP, Yu LH, 2024, How Does Artificial Intelligence Change Enterprise Demand for Labor? Analysis from Big Data of Recruitment Platforms. Management World, 40(6): 74–93.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B52" content-type="article"><label>52</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Xu CY, Qian C, Kong FB, 2024, Can Digital Rural Construction Narrow the Urban-Rural Income Gap? Empirical Test Based on Agricultural Technological Progress Mediation and Threshold Effects. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2024(12): 4–24.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B53" content-type="article"><label>53</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zhou YX, 2012, Is Social Capital the Capital of the Poor? Empirical Evidence Based on Chinese Farmers’ Income. Management World, 2012(7): 83–95.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B54" content-type="article"><label>54</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Pan LQ, Zhang SH, 2022, Can Social Networks Improve Migrant Workers’ Wages? Analysis Based on Path and Heterogeneity. Journal of Guangdong University of Finance &amp; Economics, 37(2): 15–28.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B55" content-type="article"><label>55</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Chen YZ, Zhou Q, 2024, Research on the Willingness and Influencing Factors of Mutual Support for Rural Elderly in Northeast China: Based on the Fifth Sample Survey Data of Living Conditions of Urban and Rural Elderly in China. Study &amp; Exploration, 2024(12): 103–110.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B56" content-type="article"><label>56</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dong MJ, Liang YM, Zhang QZ, 2015, China’s Industrial Capacity Utilization: Industry Comparison, Regional Gap and Influencing Factors. Economic Research Journal, 50(1): 84–98.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
