<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v7i8.12021</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Comparative Study on Governance Models of World-class Scientific and Technological Societies and Their Enlightenment to China</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/7/8/10.26689/ssr.v7i8.12021</url><author>LiuXianghui</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2025-09-17</published-time></date></history><abstract>This study comparatively analyzes governance models of scientific and technological societies across Anglo-Saxon, Continental European, and Oriental Hybrid framework, synthesizing critical external conditions for their emergence, common elements and indicator framework, internal governance and the success logic behind their effectiveness, benchmark samples and the driving forces for their vigorous development of world-class scientific and technological societies, while proposing constructive ideas for the actionable pathways of building world-class scientific and technological societies in China.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sui LR, 2017, Research on the Management System of National Social Organizations, thesis, Dalian Maritime University.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Zheng DS, Hu M, 2015, Insights into the Operation and Management of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies: A Review of the Investigation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies. Society, 2015(8): 36–39.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Dees JG, 1998, Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship, thesis, Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang SZ, Song CC, 2013, Independence or Autonomy: Reconsidering the Characteristics of Chinese Social Organizations. Chinese Social Sciences, 2013(5): 50–66.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jiang N, Cai G, 2007, The International Association for Computer Science: The Development Path of a Scientific and Technological Society Centered on Enhancing Academic Driving Force. Society, 2007(8): 15–19.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jun S, 2015, How Foreign Governments Support Scientific and Technological Societies in Carrying Out Social Services. Learning Times.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Wang P, Salamon LM, Simon C, et al., 2010, Outsourcing Government-financed Social Services to Civil Society Organizations: Lessons from China and Abroad. Peking University Press, Beijing, 202–206.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Salamon L, 2007, Global Civil Society: An International Index of the Nonprofit Sector, translated by Yimei Chen et al. Peking University Press, Beijing.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Jia XJ, Sun L, 2008, Discussion on the Index of Civil Society Measurement and Its Localization. China Nonprofit Review, 2(1): 74–90.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Fan LZ, 2003, Social Changes and Non-Governmental Organizations in the Context of Globalization. Shanghai People’s Publishing House, Shanghai, 377.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Han JF, Wang Z, 2015, The Definition and Types of Branch Organizations of National Societies. Society, 2015(8): 29–33.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>ASAE &amp; The Center for Association Leadership, 2011, 199 Ideas: Member Service and Engagement (pp. 48–51). ASAE, Washington, DC.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>ASAE &amp; The Center for Association Leadership, 2011, 199 Ideas: Member Service and Engagement (p. 8). ASAE, Washington, DC.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
