SSRScientific and Social Research2661-43322981-9946Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ssr.v8i3.14383ArticlePolarization and Rectification: Misbehavior of Giant Panda Fans—Manifestations, Causes, and Governancehttps://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/3/10.26689/ssr.v8i3.14383QinXinran2026832026-04-15Fandom culture, as a form of subculture, has garnered widespread attention across various sectors in recent years. The giant panda, a cherished species in China, has seen many individuals rise to online fame recently, propelled by live streaming and short videos, attracting a large number of fans. However, public incidents such as the “Warmth the Panda being hit” controversy have revealed concerns about the encroachment of pathological fandom culture into the “panda community.” Based on participatory observation of the Weibo super topic “Giant Panda He Hua”, this study finds that the frequent occurrence of misbehaviors—such as malicious rumormongering, rival-bashing, and attacking pandas or keepers, and disrupting normal zoo operations—is driven by several factors. These include some fans’ feelings toward giant pandas evolving from an “interest” into an extreme, profound, and constructed mother-child relationship, as well as blind conformity under group pressure and the erosion of group values among fans. Correcting this radicalized phenomenon requires a multi-pronged approach involving the state, platforms, panda institutions, fan communities, and individual fans. The goal is to guide fans to integrate with mainstream culture while expressing their emotions, thereby fostering their self-development through rational engagement with pandas.

Huang L, 2013, The Giant Panda: Communication Symbol and the Cultural Transformation of City Image. Forum on Chinese Culture, 2013(12): 153–156.

Wu SJ, 2013, American Transformation of Chinese Genes: On the Chinese Cultural Metaphors in the Kung Fu Panda Animated Film Series. Contemporary Cinema, 2013(5): 195–198.

Maan B, 2020, Affective Economies, Pandas, and the Atmospheric Politics of Lively Capital. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(3): 678–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12361

Hartig F, 2013, Panda Diplomacy: The Cutest Part of China’s Public Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8(1): 49–78.

Schaller GB, 1994, The Last Panda. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Benabdallah L, 2015, Political Representation of China–Africa: The Tale of a Playful Panda, or a Threatening Dragon? Africa Review, 7(1): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2014.977587

Collard RC, 2013, Panda Politics. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien, 57(2): 226–232.

Mao D, Wang JY, Chen JJ, 2021, Observation on “Fandom”: Organizational Characteristics and Intra-Community and Extra-Community Relationships. Sociological Studies, 36(6): 90–112 + 228.

Ji WM, 2021, Guarding Against the Erosion of Young People’s Values by “Fandom” Chaos. People’s Tribune, 2021(10): 30–33.

Zhang JL, Fang MD, 2022, Lost Carnival: Manifestations, Causes, and Governance of “Fandom Culture” Anomie. Contemporary Youth Research, 2022(2): 88–93.

Wang SY, Chen C, 2023, Quantified Love and Visible Power: The Interaction between Fan Communities and Platform Algorithms. Chongqing Social Sciences, 2023(3): 131–144.

Mao YF, Wang Y, 2022, “Fandom” Chaos and Its Ideological Critique. Journal of Chinese Youth Social Science, 41(5): 52–59.

Gao HC, Zhang JQ, 2021, Diversified Coordination and Cross-Domain Cooperation: The Urgent Need for Paradigm Change in Online Cultural Community Governance. Academic Forum, 44(5): 115–124.

Chen S, 2020, On the Discursive Construction of Circle Identity Among Contemporary Youth. China Youth Study, 2020(11): 80–86.