SSRScientific and Social Research2661-43322981-9946Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ssr.v8i5.15047ArticleResources, Discourse, and Action: The Operational Logic of Collaborative Governance Among Urban Community Organizations in Chinahttps://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/5/10.26689/ssr.v8i5.15047LiPengfei2026852026-06-05The governance system of Chinese urban communities has undergone continuous reconstruction in the rapid social transformation. The rise of diverse governance entities has led to an increasing complexity in the field of community governance. How to coordinate community organizations with different statuses, resources, and action logics to achieve effective governance has become a core issue that urgently needs to be addressed. Within conventional state-society dichotomies in existing literature, this article proposes an analytical framework of “resources- discourse-action”, which is integrated with Giddens’ structured theory to examine the interaction and collaboration mechanisms between grassroots community organizations in cities. Through long-term ethnographic research on multiple communities in Shanghai, this article found that although there is a significant asymmetry in resource endowment between primary-level Party organizations and neighborhood committees, homeowner committees, property management companies, and community self-organization, they ultimately achieve a “differential equilibrium” through a complex exchange mechanism embedded in formal institutions and informal practices. The findings of this study have deepened the understanding of the micro-mechanisms of collaborative governance in Chinese urban communities during the transition period, unveiled the underlying logic of multi-stakeholder governance, and offered fresh empirical and theoretical insights into the cooperation between the government and grassroots society.

Wu KS, 2007, A Study on the Transformation Forms of Mobilization Mechanisms in Contemporary China. Inner Mongolia Social Sciences (Chinese Edition), 2007(3): 5–10.

Zhang XX, 2010, A Study on the Modes and Mobilization Mechanisms of Urban Residents’ Community Participation, thesis, Jilin University.

Wei N, 2003, Community Organization and Community Development. Red Flag Publishing House, Beijing.

Yu KP, 2002, An Introduction to Global Governance. Marxism & Reality, 2002(1): 20–32.

Zhang BF, 2005, A Review of Urban Community Autonomy Research. Jinyang Academic Journal, 2005(1): 22–26.

Xu BK, Li PN, 2012, State–society, Space–actor, Power and Governance in Community Studies: A Literature Review of Recent Community Research. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2012(5): 36–47.

Lu CP, Deng WZ, 2006, Social Practice as a Mediator between Agency and Structure: An Interpretation of Giddens’ Structuration Theory. Study and Practice, 2006(2): 76–83.

Chen P, 2013, Research on Homeowners’ Associations from a Three-dimensional Perspective of State–market–society: A Case Study of Commercial Housing Communities in City B. Journal of Public Management, 2013(7): 75–89 + 140–141.

Zhao XM, 2008, State–society Relations in Grassroots Governance: An Investigation of an NGO Participating in Community Public Services. Open Times, 2008(4): 87–103.

Shi FY, 2010, Homeowners’ Associations, Quasi-factional Politics, and Grassroots Governance: A Case Study of a Shanghai Neighborhood. Sociological Studies, 2010(3): 136–158 + 245.

Li XP, Cao CL, 2013, Community Self-organization and the Production of Community Public Space. Urban Problems, 2013(6): 85–89.

Giddens A, 1998, The Constitution of Society (Li Kang & Li Meng, Trans.). SDX Joint Publishing Company, Hong Kong.

Gao XY, 2005, Contemporary Social Theory. China Renmin University Press, Beijing.

Chen WD, Zhang WJ, 2011, Institutional Arrangements and Practical Logic of Residents’ Committees from the Perspective of Contract Theory. Socialism Studies, 2011(2): 90–94.

Xu YX, 2000, On Community Development. East China University of Science and Technology Press, Shanghai.