SSRScientific and Social Research2661-43322981-9946Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.10.26689/ssr.v8i6.15432ArticleA Study on the Motivations for Social Organizations’ Participation in Hierarchical Evaluation from the Perspective of Rational Choice Theory: A Case Study of Shanghai’s P Districthttps://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/6/10.26689/ssr.v8i6.15432ZhuHaiyan2026862026-07-15Tiered evaluation of social organizations is a typical institutional form to boost public trust in them. However, in practice, there is often a bit of a challenge where the government is quite eager to participate, but social organizations can sometimes feel a bit apathetic. This study employs rational choice theory and takes Shanghai’s P District as a case study to conduct an in-depth qualitative analysis of the motivational mechanisms driving social organizations’ engagement in the evaluation system. The study reveals that the decision-making process of social organizations regarding evaluation participation is based on rational cost-benefit-risk calculations. At the micro level, uncertain expected returns, high participation costs, and a lack of efficacy perception inhibit willingness to participate; at the macro level, the “single-center” evaluation structure suppresses organizational autonomy, while deficiencies in technical rationality and legal foundations raise participation barriers. Together, these factors result in low evaluation coverage and widespread formalism. Therefore, it is essential to transform the evaluation system from “administrative control” to “development governance”, optimizing institutional structures at the macro level, innovating technical mechanisms at the meso level, and implementing targeted empowerment at the micro level. This study elucidates the complex mechanisms underlying insufficient motivation for evaluation participation, providing theoretical and practical insights for fostering endogenous development momentum within social organizations.

Zheng J, Bu X, 2020, Failed Third Parties: Social Organization Evaluation under Organizational Self-interest. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), 2020(5): 98–112.

Xu S, Cui D, 2016, Research on Improving the Third-party Evaluation Mechanism for Social Organizations: Based on Survey Data from Five Cities. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 2016(6): 52–57.

Xu S, Cui D, 2018, Third-Party Evaluators of Social Organizations and their Capacity Building. Jinyang Academic Journal, 2018(5): 105–110.

Tao C, Zhang H, 2020, Differentiated Support: A New Perspective on Social Organization Management. New Vision, 2020(2): 95–101.

Xu J, 2018, Development Report on Social Organization Evaluation in China. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing.

Gugerty MK, Prakash A, 2010, Trust but Verify? Voluntary Regulation Programs in the Nonprofit Sector. Regulation & Governance, 4(1): 22–47.

Gugerty MK, 2009, Signaling Virtue: Voluntary Accountability Programs among Nonprofit Organizations. Policy Sciences, 42(3): 243–273.

Xu J, Peng L, 2019, Improving Social Organization Capacity and Credibility through Social Organization Evaluation. China Social Organizations, 2019(4): 46–47.

Chen J, Feng H, 2018, The Institutional Structure of Social Organization Evaluation and Directions for Reform. Journal of Yunnan University (Social Sciences Edition): 17(3): 107–114.

Bach-Mortensen AM, Montgomery P, 2018, What are the Barriers and Facilitators for Third Sector Organizations (Non-profits) to Evaluate their Services? A Systematic Review. Systematic Reviews, 7(1): 1–14.

El Ashfahany A, Jihad MR, Kurniawati NN, et al., 2024, Balanced Scorecard Approach to Measuring the Performance of a Non-Profit Organization: Case Study on a Waqf-based Pesantren in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2): 600–613.

Coleman JS, 1990, Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Deng G, 2001, Assessment of Non-profit Organizations. Social Sciences Academic Press, Beijing.

Pudong New Area People’s Government, 2026, April 17, 2024 Pudong New Area Annual Government Work Report. https://www.pudong.gov.cn/008006039024/20260417/825116.html

Homans GC, 1961, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt, Brace & World, California.

Bandura A, 1977, Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2): 191–215.

Ji Y, 2009, Reflections on the Government’s Role in Social Organization Evaluation. Xuehui (The Journal of the Society): (2): 7–11.

Pfeffer J, Salancik GR, 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.

Cao T, 2015, Social Organization Evaluation: Dilemmas and Breakthroughs—A Case Study of Shenzhen’s Social Organization Assessment. Huxiang Forum, 28(6): 79–85.