<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v8i7.15793</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Integrating Space Syntax, Behavioral Sensing, and Machine Learning for Campus Public Space Optimization: A Critical Review</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/7/10.26689/ssr.v8i7.15793</url><author>LiHaopeng,AlobaedyMustafa Muwafak,Bin IbrahimMohd Nurul Hafiz,ChenEnci</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>7</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-14</published-time></date></history><abstract>Most university campuses still decide where to put public spaces the old way—by walking the site, asking a few people, and trusting experience. That works until the campus grows fast or the student body becomes more mixed. Then the gaps show up: underused plazas, overcrowded paths, places that look good on plan but feel empty in real life. Over the last ten years, researchers have started bringing together Space Syntax measures, Wi-Fi movement data, GIS multi-criteria tools, and machine learning weight adjustments. The combination looks promising on paper. In practice, the pieces rarely talk to each other. This review looks at what has been tried, where the methods still fall short—especially on international campuses—and what a more joined-up approach might look like.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hillier B, Hanson J, 1984, The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B2" content-type="article"><label>2</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hillier B, Penn A, Hanson J, et al., 1993, Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20(1): 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B3" content-type="article"><label>3</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Gehl J, 2011, Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, Washington.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B4" content-type="article"><label>4</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Whyte WH, 1980, The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Conservation Foundation.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B5" content-type="article"><label>5</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Abu-Ghazzeh, TM, 1999, Communicating Behavioral Research to Campus Design: Factors Affecting the Perception and Use of Outdoor Spaces at the University of Jordan. Environment and Behavior, 31(6): 764–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972344</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B6" content-type="article"><label>6</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lau SSY, Gou Z, Liu Y, 2014, Healthy campus by Open Space Design: Approaches and Guidelines. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4): 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B7" content-type="article"><label>7</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Hajrasouliha A, 2017, Campus Score: Measuring University Campus Qualities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017(158): 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.10.007</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B8" content-type="article"><label>8</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Malczewski J, 2006, GIS-based Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Survey of the Literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810600661508</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B9" content-type="article"><label>9</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Saaty TL, 2008, Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B10" content-type="article"><label>10</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Kim M, Kotz D, Kim S, 2006, Extracting a Mobility Model from Real User Traces. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2006.173</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B11" content-type="article"><label>11</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Ratti C, Frenchman D, Pulselli RM, et al., 2006, Mobile Landscapes: Using Location Data from Cell Phones for Urban Analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(5): 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32047</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B12" content-type="article"><label>12</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Sapiezynski P, Stopczynski A, Gatej R, et al., 2015, Tracking Human Mobility Using WiFi Signals. PLOS ONE, 10(7): e0130824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130824</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B13" content-type="article"><label>13</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Breiman L, 2001, Random Forests. Machine Learning, 45(1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B14" content-type="article"><label>14</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Strobl C, Boulesteix AL, Zeileis A, et al., 2007, Bias in Random Forest Variable Importance Measures: Illustrations, Sources and a Solution. BMC Bioinformatics, 2007(8): 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-25</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B15" content-type="article"><label>15</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Lundberg SM, Lee SI, 2017, A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017(30): 4765–4774.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B16" content-type="article"><label>16</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Valks B, Arkesteijn M, Den Heijer A, 2019, Smart Campus Tools 2.0: Exploring the Use of Real-time Space Use Measurement at Universities and Organizations. Facilities, 37(13/14), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2018-0136</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B17" content-type="article"><label>17</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Valks B, Arkesteijn M, Koutamanis A, et al., 2021, Towards Smart Campus Management: Defining Information Requirements for Decision Making through Dashboard Design. Buildings, 11(5), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050201</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B18" content-type="article"><label>18</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Penn A, Hillier B, Banister D, et al., 1998, Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25(1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1068/b250059</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B19" content-type="article"><label>19</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Turner A, 2007, From Axial to Road-centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(3): 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32067</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref><ref id="B20" content-type="article"><label>20</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>Talen E, Anselin L, 1998, Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4): 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1068/a300595</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
