<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v8i8.15302</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Paths and Boundaries of Area Studies in the Foreign Language Disciplines: Reflections from the Perspective of Mutual Learning among Civilizations</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/8/10.26689/ssr.v8i8.15302</url><author>GuoQi,LiPing</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>The elevation of Area Studies to a first-level discipline under the category of Interdisciplinary Studies in China&amp;rsquo;s 2022 catalog of graduate disciplines has placed the foreign language disciplines at the center of a nationwide debate: what can they contribute to Area Studies, and where should their involvement stop? Drawing on the international history of Area Studies and on the Chinese concept of mutual learning among civilizations, this paper argues that the foreign language disciplines possess a distinctive and irreplaceable foundation for Area Studies&amp;mdash;direct access to primary sources, philological competence, and long experience of cross-cultural mediation&amp;mdash;but that their participation must be disciplined by clear boundaries. From the perspective of mutual learning among civilizations, Area Studies should be conceived neither as intelligence gathering nor as the unilateral representation of an objectified &amp;ldquo;other,&amp;rdquo; but as a dialogic practice in which the knowing subject is itself transformed. The paper proposes four concrete paths for foreign-language-based Area Studies (language-anchored deep knowledge, text- and discourse-centered methodology, translation as knowledge production, and the cultivation of compound talents) and delineates three boundaries that should not be crossed: the disciplinary boundary against amateurish interdisciplinarity, the epistemic boundary against theory-less empiricism, and the ethical boundary against the instrumentalization of knowledge about other societies. Recognizing both the paths and the boundaries, the paper concludes, is the precondition for a Chinese Area Studies that is academically credible and civilizationally self-reflexive.</abstract><keywords>Area studies, Foreign language disciplines, Mutual learning among civilizations, Interdisciplinarity, Knowledge production</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] The Academic Degrees Committee of the State Council, Ministry of Education, 2022, Catalogue of Disciplines and Specialties for Graduate Education.
[2] Guo YJ, 2023, Area Studies in Foreign Language Disciplines: Concepts, Connotations, Orientation, and Content. Foreign Language Education in China, 2023(1): 23&amp;ndash;29.
[3] Guo YJ, 2024, How Can the Foreign Language Discipline Make its Unique Contribution to the Construction of Area Studies? Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 2024(5): 9&amp;ndash;11.
[4] Geertz C, 1983, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. Basic Books, New York.
[5] Zhai SL, Liu M, 2025, The Composition and Cultivation Path of Core Competencies for Area Studies Talents. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 2025(1): 182&amp;ndash;190.
[6] Said EW, 1978, Orientalism. Pantheon Books, New York.
[7] Wallerstein I, 1997, The Unintended Consequences of Cold War Area Studies, in The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years. New Press, New York, 195&amp;ndash;231.
[8] Rafael VL, 1994, The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States. Social Text, 1994(41): 91&amp;ndash;111.
[9] Bates RH, 1997, Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? PS: Political Science &amp;amp; Politics, 30(2): 166&amp;ndash;169.
[10] Xie T, Chen Y, Dai CZ, et al., 2022, Constructing Area Studies with Chinese Characteristics. International Forum, 24(3): 3&amp;ndash;35.
[11] Ning Q, 2024, Area Studies as a First-Level Discipline and Country and Area Research from the Perspective of Foreign Language Education. Journal of Language Policy and Language, 11(2): 1&amp;ndash;10.
[12] Fairclough N, 2013,&amp;nbsp;Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Routledge, London.
[13] Wang Z, 2023, The Integration of International Relations and Area Studies, World Social Sciences, 2023(5): 192&amp;ndash;209.
[14] Fan LY, Li J, 2022, General Situation and Challenges of the Education of Area Studies as a Discipline in China, in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education: Current Issues and Digital Technologies (ICECIDT 2022). Atlantis Press, Dordrecht, 467&amp;ndash;475.
[15] Chen Y, Yang LR, Xu YN, 2023, Area Studies as a First-level Discipline and Country and Area Research from the Perspective of Foreign Language Education. Foreign Language Higher Education Research, 2023(5): 89&amp;ndash;97.
[16] Miyoshi M, Harootunian HD, 2002, Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Duke University Press, North Carolina.
[17] Szanton DL, 2004, The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. University of California Press, California.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
