<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v8i8.15333</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Labor Law Identification of Algorithm Control Intensity in the Gig Economy: The Core Criterion of Technical Subordination</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/8/10.26689/ssr.v8i8.15333</url><author>ShangXiaoxiao</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>8</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-08-31</published-time></date></history><abstract>As digital technology deeply penetrates the labor market, the gig economy is reshaping employment patterns through the &amp;ldquo;platform + individual&amp;rdquo; model. Platforms rely on algorithms to reconstruct labor management processes, causing traditional labor law identification standards to fail. This paper focuses on &amp;ldquo;algorithm control intensity,&amp;rdquo; constructs a three-dimensional framework of &amp;ldquo;Dispatch Mode&amp;mdash;Reward/Penalty Mechanism&amp;mdash;Autonomy Degree&amp;rdquo; by combining Supreme Court cases and Suzhou pilot experiences, and provides an analytical path for labor law to adapt to the gig economy and mitigate adjudication divergence in platform-related labor cases.</abstract><keywords>Gig economy, Algorithm control intensity, Labor law, Identification of labor relations, Technical subordination</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] All-China Federation of Trade Unions, 2023, Bulletin of the 9th National Workforce Survey.
[2] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security of China et al., 2021, Notice on Carrying out the Pilot Work of Occupational‑Injury Protection for Workers in New‑Forms Employment. https://www.mohrss.gov.cn
[3] Tian SL, 2022, Employer&amp;rsquo;s Algorithmic Power and Legal Regulation under Technical Subordination. Chinese Journal of Law, 44(6): 132&amp;ndash;150.
[4] Supreme People&amp;rsquo;s Court of the People's Republic of China, 2012, Labor Contract Law of the People&amp;rsquo;s Republic of China (2012 Revision).
[5] Supreme People&amp;rsquo;s Court, 2024, The 42nd Batch of Guiding Cases (No.237, 238,239, 240). Official Website of the Supreme People&amp;rsquo;s Court.
[6] Wang TY, 2025, Understanding and Application of &amp;ldquo;Dominant Labor Management&amp;rdquo;. https://www.chinacourt.cn/article/detail/2025/03/id/8742701.shtml</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
