<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26689/ssr.v8i9.15748</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>Japanese “Standard Women’s Language” Viewed from the Perspective of Language Policies</title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/8/9/10.26689/ssr.v8i9.15748</url><author>ZhaoHong</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>8</volume><issue>9</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2026-10-21</published-time></date></history><abstract>Japanese women&amp;rsquo;s language is traditionally regarded as attributable to women&amp;rsquo;s physiological qualities as well as the linguistic characteristics of the Japanese language. This point of view, however, does not hold true for the &amp;ldquo;standard women&amp;rsquo;s language&amp;rdquo; that occurred in Japan&amp;rsquo;s modern history. This paper examines the &amp;ldquo;standard women&amp;rsquo;s language&amp;rdquo; from the perspective of language policies and, through citing and analyzing relevant documents, attempts to prove that the so-called &amp;ldquo;standard women&amp;rsquo;s language&amp;rdquo; is a concept resulting from the normalization of the relationships between gender, language, and power, and the product of the process of Japan&amp;rsquo;s modernization.</abstract><keywords>Japanese women’s language, Language policies, The concept of “Standard Women’s Language”, Normalization</keywords></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list><ref id="B1" content-type="article"><label>1</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><p>[1] Ozaki Y, 1999, Josei-go no Jumyō (The Lifespan of Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Nihongogaku 8‑10, Meiji Shoin.
[2] Ishikuro O, 1943, Utsukushii Nihongo &amp;mdash; Josei Shinsho (Beautiful Japanese &amp;ndash; Women&amp;rsquo;s New Book). Kōfūkan.
[3] Morino M, 1991, Josei-go no Rekishi (History of Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Kōza Nihongo to Nihongo Kyōiku 10, Meiji Shoin.
[4] Ozaki Y, 1997, Josei Sen&amp;rsquo;yō no Bunmatsu Keishiki no Ima (The Present State of Sentence‑Final Forms Exclusive to Women), in Josei no Kotoba・Shokuba-hen (Women&amp;rsquo;s Language・Workplace Edition). Hitsuji Shobō.
[5] Nagao M, 1935, Josei to Kotoba (Women and Language). Tsukuda Shobō.
[6] Yoshida S, 1935, Fujin no Kotoba (Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Kotoba no Kōza 2, Nippon Hōsō Kyōkai.
[7] Kikuzawa K, 1929, Fujin no Kotoba no Tokuchō ni Tsuite (On the Characteristics of Women&amp;rsquo;s Speech). Kokugo Kyōiku 14‑3, Meiji Shoin.
[8] Kikuzawa K, 1933, Kokugaku Kagaku Kōza 3: Kokugogaku, Kokugo Isōron (National Language Science Lectures 3: National Language Studies, National Language Register Theory). Meiji Shoin.
[9] Mashita S, 1948, Fujin-go Kenkyū (A Study of Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Tōa Shuppansha.
[10] Kunida Y, 1964, Nyōbō Kotoba no Kenkyū (A Study of Court Ladies&amp;rsquo; Language). Kazama Shobō.
[11] Ide S, 1989, A Comparison of Honorific Expressions and Gender Differences (Taigū Hyōgen to Danjo-sa no Hikaku), in Nichiei-go Hikaku Kōza Vol. 5: Bunka to Shakai (Japanese&amp;ndash;English Comparative Lectures Vol. 5: Culture and Society). Taishūkan Shoten, Tokyo.
[12] Ide S, 1997, Nihongogaku Sōsho: Josei-go no Sekai (Japanese Linguistics Series: The World of Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Meiji Shoin.
[13] Horii R, 1993, Josei-go no Seiritsu (The Formation of Women&amp;rsquo;s Language). Nihongogaku Zōkan, Meiji Shoin.
[14] Endō O, 1997, Shokuba no Keigo no Ima (Honorifics in the Workplace Today), in Josei no Kotoba・Shokuba-hen (Women&amp;rsquo;s Language・Workplace Edition). Hitsuji Shobō.
[15] Endō O, 2001, Onna to Kotoba &amp;ndash; Onna wa Kawatta ka Nihongo wa Kawatta ka (Women and Language &amp;ndash; Have Women Changed? Has Japanese Changed?). Akashi Shoten.
[16] Ōkubo T, 1956, Kotobazukai no Shinri (The Psychology of Language Use). Rokugatsusha.
[17] Mio I, 1955, Hanashi Kotoba no Bunpō: Kotoba‑zukai‑hen, Fukkoku (Grammar of Spoken Language: Usage Edition, Reprint). Kuroshio Shuppan.
[18] Andō M, 1979, A Study of Alternate Names and Clandestine Terms, with Special Reference to the Taboo Words of the Saigū (Imyō Ingo no Kenkyū o Nobete Taku ni Saigū Imi Kotoba o Ronzu), in Nihongo no Gengogaku Dai-go-kan: Imi, Goi. Taishūkan Shoten (originally published in 1913, Kokugakuin Zasshi vol. 19, no. 17).
[19] Kindaichi K, 1942, Josei-go to Keigo (Women&amp;rsquo;s Language and Honorifics), in Kokugo Kenkyū (National Language Studies). Yakumo Shorin.
[20] Hoshina K, 1936, Kokugo to Nihon Seishin (The National Language and the Japanese Spirit). Jitsugyō no Nihonsha.
[21] Sofue T, 1924, Bunka to Pāsonariti (Culture and Personality). Kōbundō.
[22] Takakusu J, Watanabe K, 1924, Taishō Shinshū Daizōkyō (Taishō Revised Tripiṭaka). Daizō Shuppan Kabushiki Kaisha.
[23] Kaibara E, 1911, Ekiken Jikkun Jō (Ekiken&amp;rsquo;s Ten Precepts, Volume 1). Yūhōdō.
[24] Tanaka S, 1956, Josei no Danseika to &amp;ldquo;Onnarashisa&amp;rdquo; (Women&amp;rsquo;s Masculinization and &amp;ldquo;Femininity&amp;rdquo;). Fujin Kōron 2, Chūō Kōron Shinsha.
[25] Takasaki M, 2002, &amp;ldquo;Onna Kotoba&amp;rdquo; o Tsukurikaeru Josei no Tayō na Gengo Kōdō (Diverse Language Behaviors of Women Reshaping &amp;ldquo;Women&amp;rsquo;s Language&amp;rdquo;). Gengo 31‑2, Taishūkan Shoten.</p><pub-id pub-id-type="doi"/></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
