<?xml version="1.1" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/xsd/JATS-journalpublishing1-mathml3.xsd" dtd-version="1.1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SSR</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Scientific and Social Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn>2661-4332</issn><eissn>2981-9946</eissn><publisher><publisher-name>Bio-Byword Scientific Publishing Pty. Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36922/ssr.v4i1.1314</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title>A Review of the Enterprise Theory: Formation, Essence, Boundary and Goal </title><url>https://artdesignp.com/journal/SSR/4/1/10.36922/ssr.v4i1.1314</url><author>YangHua</author><pub-date pub-type="publication-year"><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><history><date date-type="pub"><published-time>2022-01-20</published-time></date></history><abstract>Based on the formation, essence, boundary and goal of different enterprise theories as the review object, this paper reviews the enterprise theory of neoclassical economics. It is the four mainstream schools of enterprise contract theory and the enterprise theory of stakeholder collective choice. Additionally, it includes a brief and pertinent evaluation and comparison of these views.</abstract><keywords/></article-meta></front><body/><back><ref-list/></back></article>
